Search results for " Proportionality"

showing 10 items of 12 documents

Note critiche sui nuovi reati a tutela del patrimonio culturale: incoerenze normative e questioni aperte

2022

Il presente contributo analizza la recente riforma in materia di tutela penale dei beni culturali. Lungi però dal voler fornire un quadro generale della stessa, l’articolo si concentra esclusivamente su due profili problematici, entrambi presumibilmente figli di una non adeguata ponderazione delle scelte di incriminazione. Sotto un primo profilo, si analizzano le possibili censure di irragionevolezza sanzionatoria della recente normativa se paragonata alla disciplina prevista dalla legge n. 45/2009. In aggiunta, l’attenzione è rivolta alle possibili carenze in punto di contrasto al fenomeno del traffico di beni culturali, vagliando criticamente la scelta di criminalizzazione della condotta …

Criminal protection of cultural property proportionality unlawful possession of cultural propertyTutela penale dei beni culturali proporzionalità detenzione illecita del bene culturaleSettore IUS/17 - Diritto Penale
researchProduct

Management of Distribution Risks and Digital Transformation of Insurance Distribution—A Regulatory Gap in the IDD

2021

The Insurance Distribution Directive (IDD) aims to regulate insurance distribution in the EU regardless of distribution channels and means. Although new technologies affect insurance distribution, the IDD does not explicitly regulate this digital transformation. Insurers and intermediaries must comply with detailed business conduct rules that aim to counteract distribution risks. However, the IDD exempts ancillary insurance intermediaries from its scope when they meet certain conditions. The article highlights the regulatory framework on insurance, requiring insurers and intermediaries to address distribution risks, and analyses how this exemption affects the management of distribution risk…

Emerging technologiesinsurance distributorsStrategy and ManagementEconomics Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)Distribution (economics)01 natural sciences010104 statistics & probabilityIntermediaryInsuranceAccounting0502 economics and businessHG8011-9999ddc:330principle of technological neutralityInsurance Distribution Directive0101 mathematicsproduct governanceActuarial scienceScope (project management)business.industry05 social sciencesDigital transformationprinciple of proportionalityLegislaturedistribution risksDirectiveinsurance distribution:SOCIAL SCIENCES::Business and economics::Business studies [Research Subject Categories]nsurance Distribution DirectiveScale (social sciences)digital transformation050211 marketingBusinessRisks
researchProduct

Fundamental rights and the proportionality principle

2017

The paper assesses the widespread use of the test of proportionality in fundamental rights adjudication. While constitutional and human rights courts all over the world appear to be consistently engaged in deploying the test of proportionality in order to assess the permissibility of a given rights limitation, this approach is under severe criticism insofar as it is considered an attack to the very idea of fundamental rights. The paper will discuss this criticism of the use of proportionality, and will provide a defense of its use by courts in light of some basic features of the contemporary discourse of fundamental rights. El artículo evalúa el uso generalizado de la prueba de proporcional…

ProporcionalidadSettore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoDerechos fundamentales - limitación de derechos - proporcionalidadFundamental rights - limitations of rights - proportionality//purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00 [https]Limitación de derechosDerechos fundamentales
researchProduct

Licenziamento e rideterminazione della sanzione disciplinare nel lavoro pubblico privatizzato

2020

Il contributo, dopo un’analisi della disciplina sanzionatoria del licenziamento invalido nel pubblico impiego, prende in esame il nuovo art. 63, c. 2 bis, del D.lgs. n. 165/2001. La norma, che attribuisce al giudice il potere di rideterminare la sanzione in caso di difetto di proporzionalità, è oggi una peculiarità della disciplina del lavoro pubblico privatizzato. L’Autore ritiene che questa si ponga in controtendenza con le recenti riforme del lavoro in Italia, in quanto recupera importanti spazi alla discrezionalità giudiziale.

Settore IUS/07 - Diritto Del LavoroThe contribution after the analysis of the sanction of invalid dismissal in the public sector examines the new art. 63 paragraph 2 bis of Legislative Decree n. 165/2001. The rule which gives the judge the power to re-determine the sanction in case of lack of proportionality is today a peculiarity of the discipline of the public sector. The Author believes that this goes against the trend of recent labor reforms in Italy recovering important spaces for judicial discretion.
researchProduct

Covid 19, Stato di diritto e Convenzione europea dei diritti dell'uomo: il caso ungherese

2021

In this brief intervention it is submitted that the emergency measures against COVID-19, adopted by the Hungarian Government, infringe the rule of law under the European Convention of Human Rights. First of all, these measures appear to be discriminatory, according to art. 1 of the Convention, insofar as they expressly aim at protecting only Hungarian citizens. Furthermore, they are not “necessary” under article 15, given that they extend to the « legal security and the stability of the national economy ». Thirdly, the measures at stake cannot be deemed proportionate (under art. 15), to the extent that : (a) they are not limited in time ; (b) they provide the government with the power to ex…

Settore IUS/13 - Diritto InternazionaleHungarian emergency measures Rule of law Art. 15 of the ECHR Necessity Proportionality EU reactions Council of Europe reactions
researchProduct

Il governo tecnocratico della moneta e i crocevia del processo di integrazione europea. Riflessioni alla luce della sentenza Weiss

2021

The well known judgment of the German Constitutional Court in the “Weiss” case has been widely criticized under EU law, mainly because of its being in contrast with a preliminary ruling rendered by the European Court of Justice in 2018. At variance with these criticisms, it is here submitted that such a judgment brings well into focus some institutional ambiguities of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU); namely, the powers (more and more) exercised by the European Central Bank (ECB) in the field of macroeconomic regulation and control, in spite of (its) not being provided with political legitimacy. Seen in this perspective, the “Karlsruhe” judgment objectively looks as aimed at restoring …

Settore IUS/14 - Diritto Dell'Unione EuropeaMonetary poilicy neutrality political legitimacy democracy proportionality european integration processSettore IUS/13 - Diritto Internazionale
researchProduct

The Protection of the Right of Freedom on the European Union Level: The European Arrest Warrant and Non-custodial Pre Trial Measures. The Guideline o…

2013

"Protection of fundamental rights in particular must be central to the operation of the system": la formula, adoperata al culmine del più recente documento valutativo sull’esperienza del MAE (2011), ben sintetizza, sul piano dell'indirizzo politico, il progressivo spostamento degli accenti logici, dalla prospettiva dell'efficienza e della sicurezza a quella della primazia della tutela dei diritti individuali, dell'intero quadrante delle misure limitative della libertà individuale in ambito UE. I vissuti del principio di proporzionalità divengono, per questa via, paradigmi di fondo per la lettura del sistema in termini di applied law: i tre livelli attraverso i quali il filtro di proporziona…

Settore IUS/16 - Diritto Processuale PenalePrinciple of ProportionalityEuropean Arrest WarrantNon-custodial Pre Trial MeasureRight of Freedom
researchProduct

Diritti fondamentali e principio di proporzionalità

2014

the paper assesses the widespread use of the test of proportionality in fundamental rights adjudication. While constitutional and human rights courts all over the world appear to be consistently engaged in deploying the test of proportionality in order to assess the permissibility of a given rights limitation, this approach is under severe criticism insofar as it is considered an attack to the very idea of fundamental rights. The paper will discuss this criticism of the use of proportionality, and will provide a defense of its use by courts in light of some basic features of the contemporary discourse of fundamental rights.

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Dirittofundamental rightSettore IUS/08 - Diritto CostituzionaleproportionalityComputingMilieux_LEGALASPECTSOFCOMPUTINGfundamental rights limitations of rights proportionalitylimitations of right
researchProduct

Article 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union on the principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and pena…

2022

In this publication, I talk you about article 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union on the principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties

UNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS Y DERECHO::Derecho internacionalcharter of fundamental rightsprinciples of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penaltieseuropean union
researchProduct

Principios rectores en la adopción de diligencias limitativas de los derechos reconocidos en el art. 18 ce

2021

Criminal Procedure Law reform carried out in 2015 requires, in order to adopt the investigation proceedings that limit the rights recognized by art. 18 Spanish Constitution, to respect the guiding principles of specialty, suitability, exceptionality, necessity and proportionality. This article aims, departing from the legal text and considering existing jurisprudence, to unveil the true meaning of these principles.

necessity and proportionality. This article aims:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]Carolina Criminal Procedure Law reform carried out in 2015 requiresexceptionalityspecialityidoneidaddeparting from the legal text and considering existing jurisprudencein order to adopt the investigation proceedings that limit the rights recognized by art. 18 Spanish Constitutionespecialidadto unveil the true meaning of these principles. Diligencias de investigaciónproportionality 236 263necessityUNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICASproporcionalidadnecesidadCriminal investigations2070-8157 22082 Revista Boliviana de Derecho 565487 2021 31 7730058 Principios rectores en la adopción de diligencias limitativas de los derechos reconocidos en el art. 18 ce Sanchís Crespoexcepcionalidadsuitabilityto respect the guiding principles of specialty
researchProduct